The Best Practices to Implement Vendor Compliance in Your Warehouse

This next best practice that you can implement in your distribution center is something called vendor performance. So vendor performance is basically you as a retailer or a distributor or as an ecommerce order fulfiller you are buying your product from different vendors. 

When the vendor ship to your DC, you can rate them on how well they are doing in terms of compliance. Compliance requirements are mandatory in all of the big ecom warehouses. For example let’s take Walmart or Staples or Amazon, all these big distribution companies handle larger merchandise, which is being pushed through their supply chain. They need a lot of automation, material handling equipment, sorters, conveyors, and robots for moving these merchandise, which are products through their distribution center. They are all sent it to their stores and for fulfilling orders. When they have all this material handling equipment robots and everything, they can accept only certain box sizes, certain labels and certain barcodes. 

The barcodes, boxes have to be of a certain size, if it’s outside of that size then it has to be marked as a non-conveyable or a non-sortable or a non robot-able. Because nowadays there are a lot of robots hitting the DC so all those things will have to be complied with, only then the product will move smoothly through all these different material handling equipment. All these different material handling equipment are used, so all the boxes whatever you are shipping will go through those MHE. For a smooth operation it’s important that as a distributor you rate your vendor and give them feedback. It can be a box issue, where  the box is too big or too small. In these scenarios you cannot ride your conveyor which means you give them a range of box sizes and tell them to ship in those dimensions. 

Also the label has to be applied only in certain places, because only then the scanners can scan. The barcode and the label should also be at a certain size only, then only the scanner can scan the barcode. If it is way too small the scanner cannot scan and if the barcode is way too big the scanners cannot scan as well. All of these compliance instructions are documented in something called as compliance manual. The compliance manual is also issued to the vendor that is shipping to your facility and obviously which means in delivery there are no horror stories. 

vendor-performance

The compliance manual is big and it takes a long time to understand all the details. Sometimes there is a big difference between the compliance manual versus what this actually being requested for. Sometimes the retailer’s adds chargeback conditions in their manual, that’s when you get chargeback for non compliance. As a vendor if you’re shipping to a big retailer and if you’re not following their compliance requirements then you’re going to get a chargeback. It happens if a box instead of riding through the conveyor and getting to the destination which is either in a reserve location or active piece-pick location it ends up somewhere else. 

Someone has to manually find that box and put the Box in the right place. Let’s say that someone spent one hour fixing this compliance issue. Then the retailer is going to give chargeback for that extra one hour they spent to process they the label as the label was not applied properly or the barcode was not of the right size, or the box was not of the correct size. Incorporating a vendor performance program helps to some extent because you can drive some of the compliance requirements. Of course you want to be careful because you don’t want to issue too much chargebacks and that’s going to create a bad taste in the vendors side. 

Incorporating a vendor compliance requirement is a good idea. It’s a best practice which people will knew when they’re shipping to make sure all these are followed. Vendor should make sure that they pack the box in certain way. You can put these box sizes all those things in the compliance manual, so that’s something to think about. Basically how the way it works is there will be a different vendor performance codes. If there is a box issue, label issue, barcode issue so you can create codes such as b1, b2 or box one, box two. You can create all those codes and then assign some time against the code. If the code one is applied that means you’re spending 10 minutes on that box that means if the labor rate is like $15 per hour then a certain number of dollars is going to be assigned to that code and that’s the chargeback that goes back to the vendor. Like this we can create multiple codes and use those codes. 

If the vendor is so good you can even completely skip the quality inspection. we’ll talk about the quality inspection down the line. So that’s something to think about incorporating some kind of vendor performance program and tell your vendor to follow these compliance requirements. Please let us know what you think about this best practice in the comments section below.

Do subscribe to our YouTube Channel. 

Originally published at Smartgladiator.com on September 10, 2019.

11
Sep 2019
By Puga SankaraLeave a comment
Author:
Puga Sankara
About:
Puga Sankara is the Founder, CEO of Smart Gladiator LLC. Smart Gladiator designs, builds, and delivers market-leading mobile technology for retailers, distributors, and 3PL service providers. So far, Smart Gladiator LoadProof has been used to ship, receive, and scan more than 100 million boxes. SG LoadProof is a patent pending Centralized Enterprise Photo/Video Document System on Cloud for Supply Chain. SG LP is built on the fact that photos & videos are vital docs as important as POs/SOs/Legal Contracts/Fulfillment Orders that reside in ERP/WMS/TMS systems, that serve as compelling, conclusive, unequivocal proof of crucial, critical, vital operations executed in Supply Chain within/across orgs when fulfilling customer orders as well as meeting contractual obligations between orgs as merchandise is transferred between different parties that partake in Supply Chain functions & operations. And these photos/videos data should not be stored in someone’s Smartphone or Email Inbox or in their personal/work Computer, but should be stored in a Centralized Enterprise system, where such data can be pushed into super-fast, stored securely, accessible to all stake holders (CFO/Sales Reps/Customer Support/AR/AP) in an org, as well as facilitates super-fast retrieval/sharing. LP is an Enterprise System of record for Photo/Video docs & is as important as an ERP which is an enterprise system of record for POs, SOs, Legal Contracts between parties etc. that have huge legal ramifications, also as important as a WMS (Warehouse Management System) that hold indispensable shipment & fulfillment data on orders. Like how Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat etc. have evolved into social media platforms/systems that enable individuals to showcase their beauty/pretty clothes/lovely cosmetics/hep coolness etc., LoadProof is an Enterprise system that holds similar photos/videos, but for a different reason, not for show off, but to serve as compelling, conclusive, unequivocal & indisputable system of record and proof that can be presented even in the court of law, when there is a dispute between parties while they execute many facets of the Supply Chain functions & operations. SG LoadProof is also an Enterprise System of Record for Photos, videos and any other digital documents for your Supply Chain Network. A system of record (SOR) or source system of record (SSoR) is a data management term for an information storage system (commonly implemented on a computer system running a database management system) that is the authoritative data source for a given data element or piece of information. The need to identify systems of record can become acute in organizations where management information systems have been built by taking output data from multiple source systems, re-processing this data, and then re-presenting the result for new business use. In these cases, multiple information systems may disagree about the same piece of information. These disagreements may stem from semantic differences, differences in opinion, use of different sources, and differences in the timing of the extract, transform, and load processes that create the data they report against, or may simply be the result of bugs. The integrity and validity of any data set is open to question when there is no traceable connection to a good source, such as a known System of Record. Where the integrity of the data is vital, if there is an agreed system of record, the data element must either be linked to, or extracted directly from it. In other cases, the provenance and estimated data quality should be documented. The “system of record” approach is a good fit for environments where both: 1. there is a single authority over all data consumers, and 2. all consumers have similar needs Here, LoadProof is the System of Record for pictures and videos for all the entities in Supply chain who uses pictures and videos to track using any Supply Chain System infrastructure. 1. LoadProof provides accurate, thorough, complete, and latest information in pictures and videos related to any entity in the Supply chain that is tracked. 2. LoadProof is the single authority on pictures and videos related to any entity in the Supply Chain that is tracked 3. LoadProof doesn’t let any external system to copy the records being stored in it, which eliminates the data being duplicated in multiple places to preserve the data integrity and credibility. 4. LoadProof has a secured login procedure which lets only users with select level access to view the data and modify the records which helps in maintaining LoadProof is becoming the Industry Standard System for Photo & Video Docs for Supply Chain Smart Gladiator is located in ATDC - Advanced Tech Dev Center (tech Incubator) in Georgia Institute of Tech. Click for a demo - https://loadproof.com/apply Puga is a supply chain technology professional with more than 25 years of experience in deploying capabilities in the logistics and supply chain domain. His prior roles involved managing complicated mission-critical programs driving revenue numbers, rolling out a multitude of capabilities involving more than a dozen systems, and managing a team of 30 to 50 personnel across multiple disciplines and departments in large corporations such as Hewlett Packard. He has deployed WMS for more than 30 distribution centers in his role as a senior manager with Manhattan Associates. He has also performed process analysis walk-throughs for more than 50 distribution centers for WMS process design and performance analysis review, optimizing processes for better productivity and visibility through the supply chain. Size of these DCs varied from 150,000 to 1.2 million SQFT. Puga Sankara has an MBA from Georgia Tech. He can be reached at puga@smartgladiator.com or visit the company at www.smartgladiator.com. Also follow him at www.pugasankara.com. [Read More]
More articles by: Puga Sankara

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*